1
1
Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Jelonek
43562f97e7
realtek: dts: add link index cell to pcs-handle phandles
A SerDes can host multiple PCS links: QSGMII binds four ports to one
SerDes, USXGMII variants up to eight. Today pcs-handle references the
SerDes as a whole, with no way to express which link inside the SerDes
a port wants. The driver gets away with this because it carries its own
port->link bookkeeping and the link slot is implicit in DSA's port
iteration order -- functional, but the wiring information lives nowhere
in DT.

The upcoming fwnode_pcs migration moves PCS lookup to the generic
fwnode provider API, which disambiguates multiple instances per fwnode
via phandle cells. To make that landable as small, code-only commits,
the DT needs to carry the link index ahead of time.

Bump #pcs-cells from 0 to 1 on every SerDes node in the four SoC DTSIs
and append the link cell to every pcs-handle reference across boards
and the SWITCH_PORT_* macros. Cell values match the existing wiring:
0 for single-link SerDes (10GBase-R, SGMII, fiber, single-link
USXGMII), 0..3 per SerDes for QSGMII and USXGMII-QX, 0..7 for the
RTL9311 octal USXGMII layout.

No code reads the new cell yet -- of_parse_phandle_with_args() in the
PCS driver already cooperates with cells = 0 or 1, and the DSA glue
uses of_parse_phandle() which ignores cells entirely. The change is
runtime-neutral on its own; it exists so the follow-up code patches
can be a few lines each instead of dragging a bridge counter into the
driver to invent slot numbers DT could have provided directly.

Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/23539
Signed-off-by: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
2026-05-31 12:52:40 +02:00
Markus Stockhausen
593df57731 realtek: dts: adapt RTL839x mdio bus topology
The RTL839x actually has two mdio busses.

- mdio bus 0 serves ports 0..23
- mdio bus 1 serves ports 24..51

This is baked into hardware and cannot be changed during mdio driver
setup with any register write. With the recent changes the driver
handles ports, phys and busses in a more logical way. So a port X
is assigned to a bus Y and a phy Z (on that bus). This gives a
mapping like

- port 16 <=> bus 0, address 16
- port 32 <=> bus 1, address 8

This unique assignment is used in the mdio driver as follows:

- Request to read bus 1, address 8
- Lookup corresponding port = 32
- Read from port 32

Looking at RTL839x it becomes clear that bus/phy => port lookup can
be achieved in multiple different ways. The simple reason is, that
for this device the driver cannot setup the smi topology. It is
baked into the hardware. So adding a "virtual" second bus does not
change the hardware access but allows to keep phy addresses below 32.
Making an example

mdio_bus0 {
  PHY_C22(40, 40)
}

resolves to port 40. But the same can be achieved with

mdio_bus1 {
  PHY_C22(40, 16)
}

In the first case the kernel sees bus/phy = 0/40 and in the second
case it sees bus/phy = 1/16. Both result in the access to the same
phy device on hardware port 40.

Use this analogy for RTL839x devices to match the real hardware
topology. For this change the existing dts and

- activate mdio bus 1 in rtl839x.dtsi
- rearrange devices with ports 24..51 to make use of bus 1

Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/23186
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
2026-05-06 10:52:40 +02:00
Klaus Rubenstein
4f637a09b8 realtek: gs1900-48: add RTL8231 resets
Add reset-gpios for both RTL8231 expanders and hog the PHY reset
line on expander@3.

Signed-off-by: Klaus Rubenstein <klaus.rubenstein@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
2026-04-11 19:36:17 +02:00
Klaus Rubenstein
5eca03fa07 realtek: extract shared GS1900-48 dtsi
Move the shared hardware description from rtl8393_zyxel_gs1900-48-a1.dts
into a common rtl8393_zyxel_gs1900-48.dtsi include file. This allows
other GS1900-48 variants to reuse the shared definitions.

Signed-off-by: Klaus Rubenstein <klaus.rubenstein@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
2026-04-11 19:32:57 +02:00